Survey of reviews in Dutch press by Frits van der Waa:
As was to be expected, the premiere of Theatre of the World attracted national and international
attention, and was generally greeted with acclaim. Most of the leading Dutch newspapers reported on it. There was a
lot of praise for the music and the performers, but less so for the libretto
and the staging.
‘A masterfully
eclectic score and one of the best works and of Andriessens late period’,
writes Floris Don in NRC Handelsblad.
‘Kircher’s life is mainly an excuse to let the imagination flow as in an lsd-trip.
That Audi doesn’t get further than a tangled staging were the characters too
often aimlessely wander about is understandable.’
Trouw’s Peter van der Lint points out that some scense and
characters seem superfluous. ‘But for the rest Andriessen rules supreme, with
music that makes a lasting impression. The weakest link is Cristina Zavalloni.
Her entrances, in a floating votive picture, are marvellous, but her
performance is weak, with a hoarse, bleating vibrato.’
According to Erik
Voermans (Het Parool) Kraussers
libretto is ‘subtle and witty. The more pity that this wittiness is nowhere to
be seen in Audi’s staging.’ He rightfully remarks that the ‘tornado’ erected
bij the Brothers Quay makes it impossible to get a good view of the video
projection, and thinks that Andriessen ‘brilliant score’ is ‘very heterogenous,
fraught with music history, and therefore caleidoscopic’, so that the dramatic
line becomes fragmented. ‘But musically, this is Andriessen at his very best,
that’s for sure.’
The critic of De Volkskrant, your present writer, voiced
similar objections, but was very enthousiastic about Lindsay Kessellmann’s
performance as the Boy, ‘so convincing that is it hardly credible that the
person behind all the costumes and masks is a female soprano’.
‘This week Carré is
the place to be.’ writes Francois van den Anker (operamagazine.nl). He lauds not
just Kesselmann, but also Melrose and Beekman. ‘Especially during the first
scenes - where the audience sometimes is at a loss which way to look - Melrose
provides focus and attentio. (…) Beekman’s pope is reminiscent of the clerics
in Fellini’s movie Roma. The tenor is
razor sharp in his use of his almost hysterical timbre and shows an impressive
expressivity, which makes him the hero of this perfomance.’
The only Dutch critic
who is not convinced by Theatre is
Floris Solleveld. In his very-well balanced review on theaterkrant.nl he
describes all the interesting and praiseworthy ingredients of the opera, only to
establish: ‘But as a perfomance it doesn’t work. The intellectual fascination
for Kircher doesn’t come across. There is no book dust here. A magical trip
around the world, that the kind of thing we did in school plays.’ Nevertheless,
‘it was a moving sight, when Louis Andriessen and Reinbert de Leeuw embraced
each other during the applause; two men who embody the history of the new music
in Holland. But I could not avoid thinking: fifty years ago they would have
bashed this.’
The article in the
German Neue Musikzeitung (nmz.de) by
Frieder Reinighaus is very verbose, hard to translate and not very outspoken.
By comparison Shirley Apthorp’s review in TheFinancial Times is short and to the point. ‘It is not Andriessen’s finest
work’, she writes. ‘Krausser’s libretto, which veers between German, English,
Italian, Dutch, Spanish and French, combines intellectual pretension with
incoherence to irritating effect. Andriessen sets it with his characteristic
magpie eclecticism. […] Audi tackles the piece in good faith, bringing it an
earthy physicality layered with opulent imagery.’ And she concludes: ‘Somewhere
between the bass guitar and synthesiser, cheesy melodies and vulgar trombones,
Athanasius Kircher is left mired in his multilingual misconceptions. He is
Andriessen’s Parsifal, a holy fool sent to redeem humankind on behalf of his
composer, but he seems forever lost in his own journey.’